To ensure the comprehensive development of our eye gaze project, we implemented various methods to gather essential requirements, engaging with experts and stakeholders to refine our project’s objectives and design.

One of our initial steps was meeting with our IXN project mentor, which provided us with crucial clarification on our project brief. This guidance was instrumental in outlining the primary goals and expectations for our project, ensuring we remained aligned with the broader objectives set forth by our academic and research community.

Further enriching our understanding, we had the opportunity to meet with Anelia Gaydardzhieva, the head of operations at Motion Input Games. During this meeting, we gained valuable insights into the existing MotionInput v3.2 repository. Anelia provided an in-depth overview of the general structure, how the eye module integrates within it, and identified key areas for improvement. This discussion was pivotal in highlighting the module's weak points, offering us a clear direction on where our efforts could deliver the most impact.

A visit to SpecialEffect, a charity known for their work in customizing gaming technologies for individuals with disabilities, proved to be exceptionally enlightening. Meeting with Mick Donegan and the entire team allowed us to understand the real-world application of eye-tracking software and the significant costs associated with providing these technologies to users. This encounter helped us grasp the financial constraints that could limit the reach of our project, emphasizing the need for cost-effective solutions.

Our interaction with Harry Nelson, a tech specialist at SpecialEffect, was particularly beneficial. Harry reviewed our initial set of requirements, offering feedback on their alignment with user needs and overall effectiveness. His advice on prioritizing accuracy over aesthetic elements like interfaces and icons during the setup process was invaluable. This feedback encouraged us to focus on functionality that directly benefits the user, such as precision in tracking and ease of use.

Additionally, our visits to Richard Cloudesley School were instrumental in understanding the user's perspective more deeply. Conversations with occupational therapists allowed us to comprehend the challenges faced by our target user base. By building personas based on these interactions, we were able to keep user needs at the forefront of our development process, ensuring that our project objectives were closely aligned with what users desired most.

Finally, to ensure alignment with our requirements and satisfaction of our stakeholders, we meticulously devised a comprehensive strategy consisting of five key methodologies to guide our project's progression. By integrating the following methods with our existing efforts, we can ensure a well-rounded and user-cantered approach, ultimately leading to a more effective and impactful eye gaze solution.

• User Surveys and Questionnaires: Distribute surveys to potential users and stakeholders to gather quantitative data on their needs, preferences, and pain points.
• Prototype Testing: Develop a working prototype of the eye gaze system and conduct usability testing sessions with students at Richard Cloudesley School. Feedback from these sessions can highlight areas of improvement and refine the system’s design.
• Focus Groups: Conduct focus group discussions with potential users, including the occupational therapist that work with students with disabilities, to explore their experiences with existing technologies and gather suggestions for new features.
• Competitive Analysis: Analyse existing eye gaze and motion input technologies to identify gaps in the market and opportunities for innovation.
• Expert Panels: Organize discussions with experts in assistive technologies, user experience design, and disability rights to ensure the project meets technical standards and addresses the nuanced needs of all users.